Junio 03, 2004
Desclasificados
De buena mañana
De las noticias matutinas, destaco dos, una para llorar y la otra para reír:
* Save the Children dice que de España salen cada año 50.000 turistas sexuales para mantener relaciones con niños.
* Esperanza Aguirre, convertida en Agustina del Oso y el Madroño, soltó ayer la perla de que el Gobierno socialista no iba a acabar con "el bastión que constituyen el Ayuntamiento y la Comunidad de Madrid."
Por cierto, que Bush ya está en Italia. Y aquí, sin recibir noticias sobre Bilderberg...
Y esperando que vuelva Julián Lago con su máquina de la verdad, porque el enfrentamiento entre los ministros de Justicia (el presente y el ex) está siendo antológico. ¿Quién de los dos sabía lo del pacto antiterrorista entre un grupo de países de la UE?
Una vergüenza increíble. Y lo peor es que, una vez más, la palabra terrorista funciona como arma arrojadiza entre los diferentes partidos políticos.
No sé si arriesgarme a ver esta noche el debate a seis en TVE...
Publicado por magda Junio 3, 2004 09:18 AM
| TrackBack
Buenos días, ¿cuál de las dos es la noticia para reir, simpática? ;P Como se nota que no vives en Madrid, te puedo asegurar que el gobierno regional y municipal de esta mi comunidad no me hace ni p. gracia...
Enviado por: noalaguerra en Junio 3, 2004 10:20 AMEs que es ese tipo de cosas de las cuales te ries para no llorar.
Esperanza podria cambiar el nombre de la Comunidad de Madrid por:
"Madrid, la reserva espiritual de España, bastión de las esencias eternas e inmutables de la Patria. VIVASPAÑA!!!"
Cuando escucho a algunos militantes del PP me parece que han estado congelados durante los últimos 30 años y no se han enterado de nada.
Ya no se llevan las camisas azules, Espe.
Ya te digo, Gatmorgan!! por cierto, ¿la palabra "bastión" no suena en sí misma como muy facha? A mi me recuerda al grupo ultra del Aleti que se cargaron al pobre Aitor Zabaleta..
Y para lo de la reserva espiritual, por favor, que no cuenten conmigo..
Habrá que arriesgarse, ¿no?. Jejeje, yo siempre tan optimista.
Creo que el tema de ocultación de información en el traspaso de poderes es más relevante de lo que puede parecer.
Sobre todo teniendo en cuenta que desde la secretaría del PSOE se han sacado a la luz pública los papeles y documentos de dicho traspaso entre ministros y en ningún lugar aparece reflejado el curso de ese pacto antiterrorista con otros países europeos.
Así mismo se informa de que verbalmente tampoco se produjo esa información por parte del Partido "popular", y digo yo ¿si los populares dicen que era algo tam importante, por qué no lo pasaron por escrito?...
Más grave de lo que puede parecer. Veremos si no es la última.
Besos, fenómena.
Enviado por: jasp en Junio 3, 2004 07:56 PMImposible encontrar nada sobre Bilderberg... Yo no hago más que intentar localizar a Zapatero todo el tiempo. Al parecer, no ha pisado Italia ni ayer ni hoy. Ayer estuvo con Blair y hoy con la selección nacional. En teoría, el encuentro en Italia dura del 3 al 6. Los medios independientes que siguen el encuentro no están ofreciendo datos nuevos. Todos preveían la presencia de Zapatero, pero de momento, nada.
A ver...
Finalmente, Zapatero no aparece en la lista de participantes de Bilderberg 2004. (Más información en el post titulado ¿Zapatero en Bilderberg?) y en los comentarios al post.
Reproduzco aquí un interesante artículo aparecido ayer en la BBC sobre este selecto Club:
Bilderberg: The ultimate conspiracy theory
By Jonathan Duffy BBC News Online
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3773019.stm
The Bilderberg group, an elite coterie of Western thinkers and power-brokers, has been accused of fixing the fate of the world behind closed doors. As the organisation marks its 50th anniversary, rumours are more rife than ever.
Given its reputation as perhaps the most powerful organisation in the world, the Bilderberg group doesn't go a bundle on its switchboard operations.
Telephone inquiries are met with an impersonal female voice - the Dutch equivalent of the BT Callminder woman - reciting back the number and inviting callers to "leave a message after the tone".
Anyone who accidentally dialled the number would probably think they had stumbled on just another residential answer machine.
But behind this ultra-modest façade lies one of the most controversial and hotly-debated alliances of our times.
On Thursday the Bilderberg group marks its 50th anniversary with the start of its yearly meeting.
For four days some of the West's chief political movers, business leaders, bankers, industrialists and strategic thinkers will hunker down in a five-star hotel in northern Italy to talk about global issues.
What sets Bilderberg apart from other high-powered get-togethers, such as the annual World Economic Forum (WEF), is its mystique.
Not a word of what is said at Bilderberg meetings can be breathed outside. No reporters are invited in and while confidential minutes of meetings are taken, names are not noted.
The shadowy aura extends further - the anonymous answerphone message, for example; the fact that conference venues are kept secret. The group, which includes luminaries such as Henry Kissinger and former UK chancellor Kenneth Clarke, does not even have a website.
In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is decided by Bilderberg.
In Yugoslavia, leading Serbs have blamed Bilderberg for triggering the war which led to the downfall of Slobodan Milosevic. The Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, the London nail-bomber David Copeland and Osama Bin Laden are all said to have bought into the theory that Bilderberg pulls the strings with which national governments dance.
And while hardline right-wingers and libertarians accuse Bilderberg of being a liberal Zionist plot, leftists such as activist Tony Gosling are equally critical.
A former journalist, Mr Gosling runs a campaign against the group from his home in Bristol, UK.
"My main problem is the secrecy. When so many people with so much power get together in one place I think we are owed an explanation of what is going on.
Mr Gosling seizes on a quote from Will Hutton, the British economist and a former Bilderberg delegate, who likened it to the annual WEF gathering where "the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide".
"One of the first places I heard about the determination of US forces to attack Iraq was from leaks that came out of the 2002 Bilderberg meeting," says Mr Gosling.
But "privacy, rather than secrecy", is key to such a meeting says Financial Times journalist Martin Wolf, who has been invited several times in a non-reporting role.
"The idea that such meetings cannot be held in private is fundamentally totalitarian," he says. "It's not an executive body; no decisions are taken there."
As an up-and-coming statesmen in the 1950s, Denis Healey, who went on to become a Labour chancellor, was one of the four founding members of Bilderberg (which was named after the hotel in Holland where the first meeting was held in 1954).
His response to claims that Bilderberg exerts a shadowy hand on the global tiller is met with characteristic bluntness. "Crap!"
"There's absolutely nothing in it. We never sought to reach a consensus on the big issues at Bilderberg. It's simply a place for discussion," says Lord Healey.
Formed in the spirit of post-war trans-Atlantic co-operation, the idea behind Bilderberg was that future wars could be prevented by bringing power-brokers together in an informal setting away from prying eyes.
"Bilderberg is the most useful international group I ever attended. The confidentiality enabled people to speak honestly without fear of repercussions.
"In my experience the most useful meetings are those when one is free to speak openly and honestly. It's not unusual at all. Cabinet meetings in all countries are held behind closed doors and the minutes are not published."
That activists have seized on Bilderberg is no suprise to Alasdair Spark, an expert in conspiracy theories.
"The idea that a shadowy clique is running the world is nothing new. For hundreds of years people have believed the world is governed by a cabal of Jews.
"Shouldn't we expect that the rich and powerful organise things in their own interests. It's called capitalism."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3773019.stm
Otros artículo publicado ayer y también recogido por Tony Gosling en su página web (http://www.bilderberg.org/2004.htm#ultimate):
* DEL TELEGRAAF (Holanda)
03Jun04 - Telegraaf - PvdA'ers join 52nd Bilderberg conference
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/11044231/PvdA_ers_bij_52e_Bilderbergconferentie.html
STRESA - In the Italian city Stresa 130 European and North American topbussinesmen -diplomats and politicians meet during the 52e (buttock of the mount= fun translation) Bilderberg Conference. They discuss European-American relations, but nobody know´s what the exact topics will be during this ´informal´ meeting. The participants solemnly promise that they will not talk about the result with the press.
On behalf of the Netherlands some top business men will join this secret meeting: Antony Burgmans (Unilever), Jeroen van de Veer(Shell) and Hans Wijers (Akzo Nobel). Euro commissioner Frits Bolkestein, the Professor Economy Victor Halberstadt, PvdA-government man Bert Koenders, Eu-coordinator for terrorism Gijs de Vries and Queen Beatrix are also on the guest list.
From the United States amongst others are former vice minister of foreign affairs Richard Holbrooke, top banker David Rockefeller and former-minister of foreign affairs Henry Kissinger. Also the president of the European central bank Jean-Claude Trichet, former prime minister of Belgium Jean-Luc Dehaene and the German minister of home affairs Otto Schily are present.
According to the organizers, the conferences are held as a forum for the elite to be able to discuss world issues without interference from the media. The participants are selected on the basis of their experience, knowledge and points of view.
This year, according to the organizers, the American foreign policy, Iraq, the Middle East, NATO, China and the worldwide economic discomfort are on the agenda. The meeting is concluded Sunday, without Final Declaration, without press conference, and bound to silence for all attendees.
The Bilderberg Conference was first held in 1954, and has been named to the Dutch Hotel where that first meeting took place. The first meeting was held on initiative of prince Bernhard, who was a regular attendee for many years.
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/11044231/PvdA_ers_bij_52e_Bilderbergconferentie.html


